فیس بک پر یہ تصویر بار بار شئیر کی جا رہی ہے۔ اس طرح کی اور بھی کہیں تصاویر ہیں جنہیں نبی پاک صلی کا بتایا جا رہا ہے۔ اور ان کا حقیقی ہونے کا کوئی ثبوت موجود نہیں ہے۔ اور کمنٹس میں بھی ہم بنا سوچے سمجھے ماشاء اللہ سبحان اللہ کہ دیتے ہیں۔ ایک بھائی نےتبصرے میں کہا تھا کہ وہ پیار ہی کیا جو ثبوت مانگے۔ میں ایسے جذبات کی قدر کرتا ہوں۔ ہر مسلمان کو ایسا ہی ہونا چائیے۔ آپ ص کے اوصاف بیان ہو راہے ہوں تو پھر...
ali raza lashari00:17
han bhai apny achi bat ki hai logo ko koe ilm nhe hota asai he log deeni cheezain dai detai hen
Muhammad Irfan Kas01:00Edit
You must ask it on the Facebook to that person who is sharing.
And if the proof is given by that person, then what punishment will you get from Allah?
And if the proof is given by that person, then what punishment will you get from Allah?
Imtiaz Ahmad01:04
Allah will never punish him over irrelevant topics or decision,
our
but the person who spreads conspiracies must be punished by muslims
our
but the person who spreads conspiracies must be punished by muslims
Muhammad Irfan Kas01:10Edit
""""""""""""""Allah will never punish him over irrelevant topics or decision''''''''''''''''
Can you define these irrelevant topics or decision which are permissible and are forbidden from punishment.
Can you define these irrelevant topics or decision which are permissible and are forbidden from punishment.
Muhammad Irfan Kas01:17Edit
Collapse this comment
"""""""you must know are you child or ignorant???"""""""""
I have not asked about who I am or what do you think about me.
What I have asked is:
""""""""""""""Allah will never punish him over irrelevant topics or decision''''''''''''''''
Can you define these irrelevant topics or decision which are permissible and are forbidden from punishment.
I have not asked about who I am or what do you think about me.
What I have asked is:
""""""""""""""Allah will never punish him over irrelevant topics or decision''''''''''''''''
Can you define these irrelevant topics or decision which are permissible and are forbidden from punishment.
Muhammad Irfan Kas01:22Edit
To spread lie or to make people confuse without doing some research about the truth or false of anything is allowed in shariya or not?
Imtiaz Ahmad01:23
but the thing is not exists in Shariya don't have any value you say it true or false,
simple
simple
Muhammad Irfan Kas01:28Edit
My Dear very simple question: It is permissible to say anything untrue or not?
Or what Shariya says for a person who spread lies ?
Or what Shariya says for a person who spread lies ?
Muhammad Irfan Kas01:29Edit
Or just let me know that is there any punishment for spreading lie and confusing people or not?
Muhammad Irfan Kas01:35Edit
Collapse this comment
"""""""""""you are not in this mode to understand some thing so N.C"""""
I have not asked you about my mode. I have asked a very simple question that being a Muslim """""what is your faith about a person who spread lies or confuse people?"""
Or just let me know that is there any punishment for spreading lie and confusing people or not?
It is permissible to say anything untrue or not?
Or what Shariya says for a person who spread lies ?
I have not asked you about my mode. I have asked a very simple question that being a Muslim """""what is your faith about a person who spread lies or confuse people?"""
Or just let me know that is there any punishment for spreading lie and confusing people or not?
It is permissible to say anything untrue or not?
Or what Shariya says for a person who spread lies ?
Muhammad Irfan Kas01:42Edit
""""""""to confuse the mushriqs and munafeqs and kuffaars is right,""""
It means that it is not permissible for a Muslim to confuse another Muslim and to tell a lie to another Muslim.
Do I understand the correct meaning of what you comment above ?
It means that it is not permissible for a Muslim to confuse another Muslim and to tell a lie to another Muslim.
Do I understand the correct meaning of what you comment above ?
Muhammad Irfan Kas01:50Edit
To ask a question you do not have to ask a permission. My question is unanswered.
""""""""to confuse the mushriqs and munafeqs and kuffaars is right,""""
It means that it is not permissible for a Muslim to confuse another Muslim and to tell a lie to another Muslim.
Do I understand the correct meaning of what you comment above ?
""""""""to confuse the mushriqs and munafeqs and kuffaars is right,""""
It means that it is not permissible for a Muslim to confuse another Muslim and to tell a lie to another Muslim.
Do I understand the correct meaning of what you comment above ?
Muhammad Irfan Kas02:00Edit
Collapse this comment
""""i think its batter to ask some one before asking some thing hard?""""
I had already told you to go ahead but my question is again unanswered.
""""""""to confuse the mushriqs and munafeqs and kuffaars is right,""""
It means that it is not permissible for a Muslim to confuse another Muslim and to tell a lie to another Muslim.
Do I understand the correct meaning of what you comment above ?
1. Yes
2. No
I had already told you to go ahead but my question is again unanswered.
""""""""to confuse the mushriqs and munafeqs and kuffaars is right,""""
It means that it is not permissible for a Muslim to confuse another Muslim and to tell a lie to another Muslim.
Do I understand the correct meaning of what you comment above ?
1. Yes
2. No
Muhammad Irfan Kas02:16Edit
"""""if i say yes?""""
why if ?
Are you confused about the permission of telling a lie or to confuse a Muslim ?
why if ?
Are you confused about the permission of telling a lie or to confuse a Muslim ?
Imtiaz Ahmad02:20
who tolled you ?
and if i say that i am not confused then ?
and if i say that you are telling a lie about me that i am confused then?
and if i say that i am not confused then ?
and if i say that you are telling a lie about me that i am confused then?
Muhammad Irfan Kas02:25Edit
Collapse this commentAashiqe Alahazrat02:29
MY Dear I have asked a question only. I have not put any comments on you my dear.
Again :
why if ?
Are you confused about the permission of telling a lie or to confuse a Muslim ?
"""""and if i say that i am not confused then ?""""
Then again the question is """why if ?"""
Again :
why if ?
Are you confused about the permission of telling a lie or to confuse a Muslim ?
"""""and if i say that i am not confused then ?""""
Then again the question is """why if ?"""
abe o jahil ki nasal.... agar waqai ye NABI Pak Sallallaho Alaihe Wasallam ka hi kurta hai to is par double cross lagana ghustakhi nahi ho gi.....
Muhammad AbidYesterday 09:14
+Aashiqe Alahazrat +OMAR - AL - MUKHTAAR agar hai tu ap kohe proof tu de du na ... phr cross bhi hatta deh geh..
Syed FawadYesterday 10:40
+Muhammad Abid Afsoos ki baat to ye he k aap ne is pe is waja se croos lagaya he k aap ko beleive nahi k ye Nabi e Kareem (SAW) ka kurta , lekin aap k paas kia saboot he k ye Nabi e kareem SAW ka Kurta nahi he , Agar aap k pass bhi koi saboot nahi he to is picture per se croos hata k musalman hone ka saboot dain kyon k nabi e kareem (SAW) sy pyar he imaan he
Muhammad AbidYesterday 11:12
+Syed Fawad ha ha mere bhai ap ke pass saboot hai he nai or ap ke pass ess ka kohe jawab he nai tu ap ne ulta mere se he saboot mang leya.... ?
Hazrat ye hamare Nabi Pak S.A.A.W ne he farmaya hai ke bagheer tahqeeq ke kohe baat ageh na pheelahu... ess leye hum tahqeeq kar rahe hain.. agar ap ke pass kohe saboot hai tu farmaie... agar kohe nai hai tu zahir hai phr ye jhoot he hai... ess ke leye kohe saboot ke zaroorat nai...
Hazrat ye hamare Nabi Pak S.A.A.W ne he farmaya hai ke bagheer tahqeeq ke kohe baat ageh na pheelahu... ess leye hum tahqeeq kar rahe hain.. agar ap ke pass kohe saboot hai tu farmaie... agar kohe nai hai tu zahir hai phr ye jhoot he hai... ess ke leye kohe saboot ke zaroorat nai...
Syed FawadYesterday 11:19
Muhammad Abid App kis tahqeeki masliq se taloq rakhty hain na un ka kaam he
logo ko her baat pe kafir kehna or Nabi e Kareem se wabsta bataon ko ye keh
kr k ye sabit nahi hain jhutla na , aap se gila nahi he kyon k gila to us
se ho jo Aashiq Rashool (SAW) ho kr ye kahy App se kia kehna Chahiye
logo ko her baat pe kafir kehna or Nabi e Kareem se wabsta bataon ko ye keh
kr k ye sabit nahi hain jhutla na , aap se gila nahi he kyon k gila to us
se ho jo Aashiq Rashool (SAW) ho kr ye kahy App se kia kehna Chahiye
Muhammad AbidYesterday 11:25
+Syed Fawad main ne ap ke samne hazoor S.A.A.W ka farman bata deya hai lekin ap us par amal nai karte or apne ap ku Aashiq rasool kehte hu... Subhan Allah..
ye bhi hazoor ke gustakhi hai ke kissi ghaar ke cheez ku hazoor ke sath mansoob karna... kya pata ye qamees kissi insan ke hu... or umati ke hu or kitne he gunna keye hn us ne.. or hum usse hazoor ke sath mansoob kar rahe hn.. tu bolo ye gustakhi nai tu or keya hai....
ye bhi hazoor ke gustakhi hai ke kissi ghaar ke cheez ku hazoor ke sath mansoob karna... kya pata ye qamees kissi insan ke hu... or umati ke hu or kitne he gunna keye hn us ne.. or hum usse hazoor ke sath mansoob kar rahe hn.. tu bolo ye gustakhi nai tu or keya hai....
Syed FawadYesterday 11:30
Dekho Dear Aap Sehi kehty ho per jab cheez Hazor SAW sy mansoob he likin
sabit nahi to us k bary main fazool baat bhi nahi krni chahiye na jab tak
Tahqeeq na ho jaey ,
sabit nahi to us k bary main fazool baat bhi nahi krni chahiye na jab tak
Tahqeeq na ho jaey ,
Muhammad AbidYesterday 11:35
+Syed Fawad bhai itne barre post kohe pagal hai ju wese he post kar deh or wo bhi itne barre nabi ke barre main....
janab tahqeeq huwe hai..
janab tahqeeq huwe hai..
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 19:12Edit
Collapse this comment
+Muhammad Abid
"""""janab tahqeeq huwe hai."""""""
You are claiming that research has been done in this above comment.
My Dear I have asked you that if any research has done on this picture, then just let us know that research.
What that research tells us ? and who has done the research ? and how he has done the research ?
What are the reasons that falsify this picture?
Just share with us and do not spread any confusion in Muslims.
"""""""
فیس بک پر یہ تصویر بار بار شئیر کی جا رہی ہے۔ اس طرح کی اور بھی کہیں تصاویر ہیں جنہیں نبی پاک صلی کا بتایا جا رہا ہے۔ اور ان کا حقیقی ہونے کا کوئی ثبوت موجود نہیں ہے۔ اور کمنٹس میں بھی ہم بنا سوچے سمجھے ماشاء اللہ سبحان اللہ کہ دیتے ہیں۔ ایک بھائی نےتبصرے میں کہا تھا کہ وہ پیار ہی کیا جو ثبوت مانگے۔ میں ایسے جذبات کی قدر کرتا ہوں۔ ہر مسلمان کو ایسا ہی ہونا چائیے۔ آپ ص کے اوصاف بیان ہو راہے ہوں تو پھر تو ثبوت کی ضرورت نہیں ہونی چائیے۔ لیکن یہاں مسلہ ایک چیز کا ہے کہ یہ آپ ص کی ہے یا نہیں۔ اگر ہے پھر تو ہم سب کا ایمان ہے۔ کہ اس بابرکت چیز کی زیارت کرنا بھی ہماری خوش نصیبی ہے۔ لیکن اگرخدانخواستہ ایسا نہیں ہے تو آپ خود سوچ لیں کہ یہ کتنی بڑی گستاخی ہو گی کہ کسی بھی چیز کی نسبت آپ ص کی طرف کر دینا کہ یہ آپ ص کی ہے۔ یہ تو ہم سب جانتے ہیں کے آج کل اسلام کے خلاف کیا کچھ ہو رہا ہے۔ ۔ دشمنان اسلام اس سے فائدہ اٹھانے کی کوشش کریں گئے۔ خدا نخواستہ اگر کل کوئی ملعون کسی بھی چیز کی تصویر بنا کر شئیر کر دیتا ہے کہ یہ نعوذ باللہ نبی پاک صلی کی ہے تو کیا ہم اس پر بھی سبحان اللہ ماشاء اللہ کہیں گے.""""""""""
since in the post whatever you have written is just consist of the word """ if """" . And this word """" if """" is not a proof.
"""""janab tahqeeq huwe hai."""""""
You are claiming that research has been done in this above comment.
My Dear I have asked you that if any research has done on this picture, then just let us know that research.
What that research tells us ? and who has done the research ? and how he has done the research ?
What are the reasons that falsify this picture?
Just share with us and do not spread any confusion in Muslims.
"""""""
فیس بک پر یہ تصویر بار بار شئیر کی جا رہی ہے۔ اس طرح کی اور بھی کہیں تصاویر ہیں جنہیں نبی پاک صلی کا بتایا جا رہا ہے۔ اور ان کا حقیقی ہونے کا کوئی ثبوت موجود نہیں ہے۔ اور کمنٹس میں بھی ہم بنا سوچے سمجھے ماشاء اللہ سبحان اللہ کہ دیتے ہیں۔ ایک بھائی نےتبصرے میں کہا تھا کہ وہ پیار ہی کیا جو ثبوت مانگے۔ میں ایسے جذبات کی قدر کرتا ہوں۔ ہر مسلمان کو ایسا ہی ہونا چائیے۔ آپ ص کے اوصاف بیان ہو راہے ہوں تو پھر تو ثبوت کی ضرورت نہیں ہونی چائیے۔ لیکن یہاں مسلہ ایک چیز کا ہے کہ یہ آپ ص کی ہے یا نہیں۔ اگر ہے پھر تو ہم سب کا ایمان ہے۔ کہ اس بابرکت چیز کی زیارت کرنا بھی ہماری خوش نصیبی ہے۔ لیکن اگرخدانخواستہ ایسا نہیں ہے تو آپ خود سوچ لیں کہ یہ کتنی بڑی گستاخی ہو گی کہ کسی بھی چیز کی نسبت آپ ص کی طرف کر دینا کہ یہ آپ ص کی ہے۔ یہ تو ہم سب جانتے ہیں کے آج کل اسلام کے خلاف کیا کچھ ہو رہا ہے۔ ۔ دشمنان اسلام اس سے فائدہ اٹھانے کی کوشش کریں گئے۔ خدا نخواستہ اگر کل کوئی ملعون کسی بھی چیز کی تصویر بنا کر شئیر کر دیتا ہے کہ یہ نعوذ باللہ نبی پاک صلی کی ہے تو کیا ہم اس پر بھی سبحان اللہ ماشاء اللہ کہیں گے.""""""""""
since in the post whatever you have written is just consist of the word """ if """" . And this word """" if """" is not a proof.
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 20:36Edit
Collapse this comment
In the picture your wordings also again consist """ if """ in urdu means ""agar"".
And the whole discussion is revolving around this word """" if """.
It means that the person who is sharing the picture without any research and also you are not sure about the true or false.
But then in this whole discussion it has been for the first time that you have declared that "" the research has been done""". your words """" anab tahqeeq huwe hai."""""
So it will be helpful if you share the research with all so that everyone become aware and stop this spreading.
And the whole discussion is revolving around this word """" if """.
It means that the person who is sharing the picture without any research and also you are not sure about the true or false.
But then in this whole discussion it has been for the first time that you have declared that "" the research has been done""". your words """" anab tahqeeq huwe hai."""""
So it will be helpful if you share the research with all so that everyone become aware and stop this spreading.
Muhammad AbidYesterday 23:24
Collapse this comment
+Muhammad Irfan Kas pehle baat mujje itne ache english nai atte agar ap urdu main kar le baat tu acha hai...
janab kehne ka matlab or picture post karne ka maqsad ye hai ke hum ne purre tahqeeq ke hai lekin akhir hum insan hain na hu sakta hai shahid hum ghalty par hn...
esse leye hum ap se nihayat adab se guzarish kar rahe hain ke agar ye sache main hazoor ka libas hai tu ap humme proof de deh ... InshAllah hum rojuh kar le geh...
janab kehne ka matlab or picture post karne ka maqsad ye hai ke hum ne purre tahqeeq ke hai lekin akhir hum insan hain na hu sakta hai shahid hum ghalty par hn...
esse leye hum ap se nihayat adab se guzarish kar rahe hain ke agar ye sache main hazoor ka libas hai tu ap humme proof de deh ... InshAllah hum rojuh kar le geh...
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 23:59Edit
Collapse this comment
"""""""""""esse leye hum ap se nihayat adab se guzarish kar rahe hain ke agar ye sache main hazoor ka libas hai tu ap humme proof de deh ... InshAllah hum rojuh kar le geh...""""""""""
I am not asking you to rojuh from your point of view.
I am asking for that research which has proof that it is a fake picture.
This is what I am asking.
I am not the person who has shared this picture, I just want to know the truth.
I am not asking you to rojuh from your point of view.
I am asking for that research which has proof that it is a fake picture.
This is what I am asking.
I am not the person who has shared this picture, I just want to know the truth.
Aashiqe Alahazrat02:31
Collapse this comment
mr. abid sahab....
ALLAH Pak ka wajood
Quran Pak ALLAH ki Kitab hai...
is ka prof de saktay ho.... or NABI Pak Sallallaho Alaihe Wasallam ka Qoul jo naqal ki hai k
bagheer tahqeeq ke kohe baat ageh na pheelahu... ess leye hum tahqeeq kar rahe hain
ab pehle is baat ki tehqeeq karo k
ALLAH 1 hai
Quran ALLAH ki Kitab hai
or jis Deen k perokaar honay ka dawa hai wo Deen sahi hai...
ALLAH Pak ka wajood
Quran Pak ALLAH ki Kitab hai...
is ka prof de saktay ho.... or NABI Pak Sallallaho Alaihe Wasallam ka Qoul jo naqal ki hai k
bagheer tahqeeq ke kohe baat ageh na pheelahu... ess leye hum tahqeeq kar rahe hain
ab pehle is baat ki tehqeeq karo k
ALLAH 1 hai
Quran ALLAH ki Kitab hai
or jis Deen k perokaar honay ka dawa hai wo Deen sahi hai...
Imtiaz Ahmad15:30
ager yeh kaurta Ap saw ka hota to ess p double cross ki jasarat hi na karta koe or ager karta to oss k hath toot jaatay???
+Aashiqe Alahazrat or kess kess k ashaq ho?
+Muhammad Abid
+Muhammad Irfan Kas damag ki dahi don't have any proof just a talkative person :(
+Syed Fawad
+Aashiqe Alahazrat or kess kess k ashaq ho?
+Muhammad Abid
+Muhammad Irfan Kas damag ki dahi don't have any proof just a talkative person :(
+Syed Fawad
Muhammad Irfan Kas16:45Edit
+Imtiaz Ahmad If you have any proof that this is a fake picture then tell us.
Imtiaz Ahmad16:52
+Muhammad Irfan Kas isn't it proof that there is no any sanad or history behind it,?
can you challenge me?
can you challenge me?
Imtiaz Ahmad16:55
+Muhammad Irfan Kas
i don't tell you i've the right to express my ideas in front of world weather any one ask or not. okay i am not bound to tell your status after asking you...
i don't tell you i've the right to express my ideas in front of world weather any one ask or not. okay i am not bound to tell your status after asking you...
Muhammad Irfan Kas16:56Edit
If a sanad or history is not written with the picture then it does not means that the picture is fake.
I am asking for the research done. If you have any proof that this is a fake picture then tell us.
I am asking for the research done. If you have any proof that this is a fake picture then tell us.
Muhammad Irfan Kas17:10Edit
Collapse this comment
Now lets have a look at what is my expression and ideas about your kind of people:
Wake up Muslims:::::::
These Yazeedis, Zionist Najadis are the people who develop confusion in Muslim Ummat without any knowledge or by the means of deceiving.
What I think is this that if this picture is fake then it must have been published by these Yazeedis only, so that our Muslims share this picture and then with a planning they made their comments to confuse people. Since their all discussion was rotating around if. And this is the first time that Mr. Imtiaz Ahmad is declaring it fake without any """if """".
It means that he is a part of Yazeedi group and is developing anarchy in Muslims. It also make us think that he must have known before spreading the picture that the picture is fake, and want the Muslims to get confused. So Muslims be aware of these Yazeedis, and always make it confirm that whatever material you are provided is authentic, and has a solid reason or background. Always ask for the authentication of every writing and every pic you get, because Yazeedis like Mr. Imtiaz are the worst enemies of Muslim Ummah.
Wake up Muslims:::::::
These Yazeedis, Zionist Najadis are the people who develop confusion in Muslim Ummat without any knowledge or by the means of deceiving.
What I think is this that if this picture is fake then it must have been published by these Yazeedis only, so that our Muslims share this picture and then with a planning they made their comments to confuse people. Since their all discussion was rotating around if. And this is the first time that Mr. Imtiaz Ahmad is declaring it fake without any """if """".
It means that he is a part of Yazeedi group and is developing anarchy in Muslims. It also make us think that he must have known before spreading the picture that the picture is fake, and want the Muslims to get confused. So Muslims be aware of these Yazeedis, and always make it confirm that whatever material you are provided is authentic, and has a solid reason or background. Always ask for the authentication of every writing and every pic you get, because Yazeedis like Mr. Imtiaz are the worst enemies of Muslim Ummah.
Imtiaz Ahmad17:18 (edited)
Waqt News Exposed Fake Chakwal Mojza_1.flv
+Muhammad Irfan Kas watch series and decide..............
i am not najdi.
and who yazeed is?
tell me about him plz
+waqas gul
+Muhammad Irfan Kas watch series and decide..............
i am not najdi.
and who yazeed is?
tell me about him plz
+waqas gul
Muhammad Irfan Kas17:39Edit
Collapse this comment
This is a clip in which there is nothing mention about the picture.
http://irfankas.blogspot.com/2012/04/history-of-caliphs-from-hazrat-ali.html
The Conqueror of Qadianiat Hazrat Peer Mehr Ali Shah believes that Yazeed is cursed.
http://irfankas.blogspot.com/2012/05/lets-spread-truth-hazrat-peer-mehr-ali.html
http://irfankas.blogspot.com/2012/04/history-of-caliphs-from-hazrat-ali.html
The Conqueror of Qadianiat Hazrat Peer Mehr Ali Shah believes that Yazeed is cursed.
http://irfankas.blogspot.com/2012/05/lets-spread-truth-hazrat-peer-mehr-ali.html
Muhammad Irfan Kas17:42Edit
Collapse this comment
'Yazīd ibn Mu‘āwiya ibn Abī Sufyān, Arabic: يزيد بن معاوية بن أبي سفيان (born 645; died 683), commonly known as Yazid I, was the second Caliph of the Umayyad Caliphate (and the first one by birthright). Yazid was the Caliph as appointed by his father Muawiyah I and ruled for three years from 680 CE until his death in 683 CE.
Contents [hide]
1 Oath of Allegiance of Yazid
2 Husayn ibn Ali and Ibn az-Zubair
3 Setbacks
4 Death
5 Historical evaluation
6 See also
7 References
[edit]Oath of Allegiance of Yazid
Upon succession, Yazid asked Governors of all provinces to take an oath of allegiance to him. The necessary oath was secured from all parts of the country. Husayn ibn Ali and Abdullah ibn Zubayr refused to declare allegiance. Yazid sent Marwan, a soldier in his army, to assist in this task.[1][2]
[edit]Husayn ibn Ali and Ibn az-Zubair
Main article: Battle of Karbala
Main article: Ibn al-Zubair's revolt
Husayn ibn Ali, along with many other prominent Muslims, not only disapproved of Yazid's nomination for caliph but declared it against the spirit of Islam. While the nomination issue was deliberated upon in Medina, Abdullah ibn Zubair went with Husayn to Mecca because some prominent Muslims thought that Mecca would be the best base for launching a campaign to build up public opinion against Yazid's nomination. However, before any significant work could be done in this regard, Muawiyah died and Yazid took over the reins of government.[citation needed]
Kufa, a garrison town in what is now Iraq, had been Caliph Alī's capital and many of his supporters lived there. Husayn ibn Ali received letters from Kufa expressing its offer of support if he claimed the caliphate. As he prepared for the journey to Kufa, Abdullah ibn Umar and Abdullah ibn Abbas argued against his plan and, if he was determined to proceed to Kufa, asked him to leave women and children in Mecca, but Husayn ignored their suggestions. On the to Kufa, Husayn received the report of Muslim ibn Aqeel's death at the hands of Yazid's men and that the Kufans had changed their loyalties to Yazid, pledging support to him against Husayn and his followers.[citation needed]
Ubayd-Allah ibn Ziyad, governor of Basrah, executed one of Husayn's messengers and warned the citizens to avoid the insurgency. He sent a message to Husayn, at instruction of Yazid, stating "You can neither go to Kufa nor return to Mecca, but you can go anywhere else you want." Despite this warning, Husayn continued towards Kufa and during the trip, he and many members of his family were killed or captured at the Battle of Karbala.[citation needed]
Many Sahaba, the most prominent being Abdullah ibn Zubayr, refused to give their oath of allegiance to Yazid as they saw it as usurpation of power and not the proper way of choosing a Caliph by the Shura.{cn|July 2012}}
Abdullah launched an insurgency in the Hejaz. Yazid sent armies against him in 683. After the Battle of al-Harrah, Medina was recaptured and Mecca was besieged. During the siege, the Ka‘bah was damaged. The siege ended when Yazid died suddenly in 683 CE.
[edit]Setbacks
During the caliphate of Yazid, Muslims suffered several military setbacks. In 682 AD Yazid restored Uqba ibn Nafi as the governor of North Africa and Uqba won battles against the Berbers and Byzantines.[1] Uqba then marched westward towards Tangier and then marched eastwards the Atlas Mountains.[2] With cavalry numbering about 300, he proceeded towards Biskra where he was ambushed by a Berber force . Uqba and all his men died fighting and the Berbers launched an counter-attack and drove Muslims from North Africa.[3] This was a major setback for the Muslims as lost supremacy at sea and had to abandon the islands of Rhodes and Crete.
[edit]Death
Yazid died at the age of 38 after ruling for three years and was succeeded by his son Muawiyah II. Yazid was buried in Damascus. Although it is thought that his grave no longer exists some believe that it is located in a small street near Omayyad Mosque without any mark or distinction, as is customary in Islamic tradition.[1]
Contents [hide]
1 Oath of Allegiance of Yazid
2 Husayn ibn Ali and Ibn az-Zubair
3 Setbacks
4 Death
5 Historical evaluation
6 See also
7 References
[edit]Oath of Allegiance of Yazid
Upon succession, Yazid asked Governors of all provinces to take an oath of allegiance to him. The necessary oath was secured from all parts of the country. Husayn ibn Ali and Abdullah ibn Zubayr refused to declare allegiance. Yazid sent Marwan, a soldier in his army, to assist in this task.[1][2]
[edit]Husayn ibn Ali and Ibn az-Zubair
Main article: Battle of Karbala
Main article: Ibn al-Zubair's revolt
Husayn ibn Ali, along with many other prominent Muslims, not only disapproved of Yazid's nomination for caliph but declared it against the spirit of Islam. While the nomination issue was deliberated upon in Medina, Abdullah ibn Zubair went with Husayn to Mecca because some prominent Muslims thought that Mecca would be the best base for launching a campaign to build up public opinion against Yazid's nomination. However, before any significant work could be done in this regard, Muawiyah died and Yazid took over the reins of government.[citation needed]
Kufa, a garrison town in what is now Iraq, had been Caliph Alī's capital and many of his supporters lived there. Husayn ibn Ali received letters from Kufa expressing its offer of support if he claimed the caliphate. As he prepared for the journey to Kufa, Abdullah ibn Umar and Abdullah ibn Abbas argued against his plan and, if he was determined to proceed to Kufa, asked him to leave women and children in Mecca, but Husayn ignored their suggestions. On the to Kufa, Husayn received the report of Muslim ibn Aqeel's death at the hands of Yazid's men and that the Kufans had changed their loyalties to Yazid, pledging support to him against Husayn and his followers.[citation needed]
Ubayd-Allah ibn Ziyad, governor of Basrah, executed one of Husayn's messengers and warned the citizens to avoid the insurgency. He sent a message to Husayn, at instruction of Yazid, stating "You can neither go to Kufa nor return to Mecca, but you can go anywhere else you want." Despite this warning, Husayn continued towards Kufa and during the trip, he and many members of his family were killed or captured at the Battle of Karbala.[citation needed]
Many Sahaba, the most prominent being Abdullah ibn Zubayr, refused to give their oath of allegiance to Yazid as they saw it as usurpation of power and not the proper way of choosing a Caliph by the Shura.{cn|July 2012}}
Abdullah launched an insurgency in the Hejaz. Yazid sent armies against him in 683. After the Battle of al-Harrah, Medina was recaptured and Mecca was besieged. During the siege, the Ka‘bah was damaged. The siege ended when Yazid died suddenly in 683 CE.
[edit]Setbacks
During the caliphate of Yazid, Muslims suffered several military setbacks. In 682 AD Yazid restored Uqba ibn Nafi as the governor of North Africa and Uqba won battles against the Berbers and Byzantines.[1] Uqba then marched westward towards Tangier and then marched eastwards the Atlas Mountains.[2] With cavalry numbering about 300, he proceeded towards Biskra where he was ambushed by a Berber force . Uqba and all his men died fighting and the Berbers launched an counter-attack and drove Muslims from North Africa.[3] This was a major setback for the Muslims as lost supremacy at sea and had to abandon the islands of Rhodes and Crete.
[edit]Death
Yazid died at the age of 38 after ruling for three years and was succeeded by his son Muawiyah II. Yazid was buried in Damascus. Although it is thought that his grave no longer exists some believe that it is located in a small street near Omayyad Mosque without any mark or distinction, as is customary in Islamic tradition.[1]
Muhammad Irfan Kas17:46Edit
The authentic material is in books. written by Imam Jalaluddin Sayyoti
Imtiaz AhmadYesterday 18:04
Yazid was the Caliph as appointed by his father Muawiyah I and ruled for three years from 680 CE until his death in 683 CE.
i think its right?
i think its right?
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:07Edit
I have not asked what time you get sleep and eat and what time you get to sit on net also but what time you do not get to read books.
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:09Edit
And according to Ahl e Sunnat any person who justify Yazeed is known as Yazeedi.
I am glad that my point of view is correct as it has been proved.
I am glad that my point of view is correct as it has been proved.
Imtiaz AhmadYesterday 18:09
you don't understand i asked i only read Quran o Hadeeth to find out solutions about Islam
no others
no others
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:12Edit
And by the way where in Quran o Hadeeth it is written that:
"""Yazid was the Caliph as appointed by his father Muawiyah I and ruled for three years from 680 CE until his death in 683 CE.
i think its right?""""""
"""Yazid was the Caliph as appointed by his father Muawiyah I and ruled for three years from 680 CE until his death in 683 CE.
i think its right?""""""
Imtiaz AhmadYesterday 18:13
And according to Ahl e Sunnat any person who justify Yazeed is known as Yazeedi.
any reference???
And according to Ahl e Sunnat any person who justify Yazeed is known as Yazeedi.
any reference???
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:17Edit
You told me """"you don't understand i asked i only read Quran o Hadeeth to find out solutions about Islam
no others""""
and I am asking it through the reference of Quran o Sunnah that it is right ?
no others""""
and I am asking it through the reference of Quran o Sunnah that it is right ?
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:22Edit
Collapse this comment
Dear you told me that you do not have time to read books but only Quran o Hadith. Then you told that for Islamic knowledge you use Quran o Hadith only.
Then you agreed on the comment written on my post.
"""Yazid was the Caliph as appointed by his father Muawiyah I and ruled for three years from 680 CE until his death in 683 CE.
i think its right?""""""
Since your authentication rules are according to Quran o Sunnah therefore I am asking that from where this comment is proved by Quran o Sunnah?
Then you agreed on the comment written on my post.
"""Yazid was the Caliph as appointed by his father Muawiyah I and ruled for three years from 680 CE until his death in 683 CE.
i think its right?""""""
Since your authentication rules are according to Quran o Sunnah therefore I am asking that from where this comment is proved by Quran o Sunnah?
Imtiaz AhmadYesterday 18:30 (edited)
i asked to you not suggested him as khalifah if you have eyes then read it out.
and i don't toled you that according to hadeeth or Quran he was khalifah
and i don't toled you that according to hadeeth or Quran he was khalifah
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:30Edit
I had already posted it then what is the reason for asking.?
http://www.maktabah.org/component/content/article/92-shia/1830-yazeed-ki-shakhsiyat-ahle-sunnat-ki-nazar-mein-urdu.html?directory=143
http://www.maktabah.org/component/content/article/92-shia/1830-yazeed-ki-shakhsiyat-ahle-sunnat-ki-nazar-mein-urdu.html?directory=143
Imtiaz AhmadYesterday 18:35
you don't have any proof but just to ask questions on questions
if i give some proof would you believe ?
if i give some proof would you believe ?
Imtiaz AhmadYesterday 18:39
reference you gave is not Hadeeth,
there is written Gaus al Azam?
who is he?
there is written Gaus al Azam?
who is he?
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:41Edit
My Dear you have not given any proof about this picture that it is fake .
It depends on what proof you are giving. Is it really a proof or not. it is not necessary that whatever you say is authentic and will known and approved as proof.
It depends on what proof you are giving. Is it really a proof or not. it is not necessary that whatever you say is authentic and will known and approved as proof.
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:42Edit
Please mention where it is written and in which context it is written
Imtiaz AhmadYesterday 18:45
you give me the proof first because it has challenged by us that its fake now you proof it as true ???
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:50Edit
Collapse this comment
Wake up Muslims:::::::
These Yazeedis, Zionist Najadis are the people who develop confusion in Muslim Ummat without any knowledge or by the means of deceiving.
What I think is this that if this picture is fake then it must have been published by these Yazeedis only, so that our Muslims share this picture and then with a planning they made their comments to confuse people. Since their all discussion was rotating around if. And this is the first time that Mr. Imtiaz Ahmad is declaring it fake without any """if """".
It means that he is a part of Yazeedi group and is developing anarchy in Muslims. It also make us think that he must have known before spreading the picture that the picture is fake, and want the Muslims to get confused. So Muslims be aware of these Yazeedis, and always make it confirm that whatever material you are provided is authentic, and has a solid reason or background. Always ask for the authentication of every writing and every pic you get, because Yazeedis like Mr. Imtiaz are the worst enemies of Muslim Ummah.
These Yazeedis, Zionist Najadis are the people who develop confusion in Muslim Ummat without any knowledge or by the means of deceiving.
What I think is this that if this picture is fake then it must have been published by these Yazeedis only, so that our Muslims share this picture and then with a planning they made their comments to confuse people. Since their all discussion was rotating around if. And this is the first time that Mr. Imtiaz Ahmad is declaring it fake without any """if """".
It means that he is a part of Yazeedi group and is developing anarchy in Muslims. It also make us think that he must have known before spreading the picture that the picture is fake, and want the Muslims to get confused. So Muslims be aware of these Yazeedis, and always make it confirm that whatever material you are provided is authentic, and has a solid reason or background. Always ask for the authentication of every writing and every pic you get, because Yazeedis like Mr. Imtiaz are the worst enemies of Muslim Ummah.
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 18:52Edit
I had never claim that I have a proof.
It has been claimed by your kind of people that it is fake, and also with """if""".
It has been claimed by your kind of people that it is fake, and also with """if""".
Imtiaz AhmadYesterday 19:58
if you don't have claimed and can't respond our challenge then why you are crying over this is this your habit?
or can't see your fake faith going down?
or can't see your fake faith going down?
Muhammad Irfan KasYesterday 20:17Edit
Collapse this comment
I have asked for proof . Either it come from any side.
Since in this picture and the words written there is no word written as challenge.
Just to know the truth and when I found that there is no proof from either side, it means that it is a planted situation created to confuse the Muslims and I have already given my comments to be aware of these kind of planted disturbance.
Wake up Muslims:::::::
These Yazeedis, Zionist Najadis are the people who develop confusion in Muslim Ummat without any knowledge or by the means of deceiving.
What I think is this that if this picture is fake then it must have been published by these Yazeedis only, so that our Muslims share this picture and then with a planning they made their comments to confuse people. Since their all discussion was rotating around if. And this is the first time that Mr. Imtiaz Ahmad is declaring it fake without any """if """".
It means that he is a part of Yazeedi group and is developing anarchy in Muslims. It also make us think that he must have known before spreading the picture that the picture is fake, and want the Muslims to get confused. So Muslims be aware of these Yazeedis, and always make it confirm that whatever material you are provided is authentic, and has a solid reason or background. Always ask for the authentication of every writing and every pic you get, because Yazeedis like Mr. Imtiaz are the worst enemies of Muslim Ummah.
Since in this picture and the words written there is no word written as challenge.
Just to know the truth and when I found that there is no proof from either side, it means that it is a planted situation created to confuse the Muslims and I have already given my comments to be aware of these kind of planted disturbance.
Wake up Muslims:::::::
These Yazeedis, Zionist Najadis are the people who develop confusion in Muslim Ummat without any knowledge or by the means of deceiving.
What I think is this that if this picture is fake then it must have been published by these Yazeedis only, so that our Muslims share this picture and then with a planning they made their comments to confuse people. Since their all discussion was rotating around if. And this is the first time that Mr. Imtiaz Ahmad is declaring it fake without any """if """".
It means that he is a part of Yazeedi group and is developing anarchy in Muslims. It also make us think that he must have known before spreading the picture that the picture is fake, and want the Muslims to get confused. So Muslims be aware of these Yazeedis, and always make it confirm that whatever material you are provided is authentic, and has a solid reason or background. Always ask for the authentication of every writing and every pic you get, because Yazeedis like Mr. Imtiaz are the worst enemies of Muslim Ummah.
Muhammad Irfan Kas16:25Edit
In this post it has been said that the picture is being circulated on facebook, but no proof has been given that it has been circulated on facebook. If this picture is being circulated with the captions shown in picture then also provide us those identities who are circulating this picture.
What if this picture declares that it belongs to a Sahabi.?
This is the question for these self declared lovers of Sahaba and those who are committed in the crime of insulting """Aal e Rasool Sallalaho Alaihe Wassalam""" .
"Yazeedis are the worst enemies of Muslims"
What if this picture declares that it belongs to a Sahabi.?
This is the question for these self declared lovers of Sahaba and those who are committed in the crime of insulting """Aal e Rasool Sallalaho Alaihe Wassalam""" .
"Yazeedis are the worst enemies of Muslims"
9 people +1'd this
13 reshares
No comments:
Post a Comment